San Diego County has more biodiversity than any other county in North America and is among the top 10 biodiversity regions on earth. Given these extraordinary resources, a local environmental organization became alarmed when San Diego County proposed to rezone 200,000 acres of land in its rural “backcountry.” During the environmental review process, the County neglected to analyze the impacts that this massive rezoning program would have on the County’s sensitive habitats and wildlife. The agency also declined to adopt any mitigation, claiming that it would simply be too expensive. In ruling for the petitioners, the court rejected the County’s approach, reciting these lines from Joni Mitchell: “You don’t know what you’ve got til it’s gone.” The County was required to re-engage in the CEQA process and identify appropriate mitigation for the rezoning. This case illustrates the statute’s chief benefit: when the public and decision-makers are informed of environmental impacts, a better project will emerge.
CEQA Successes
- Reversing Approval of Insecticide Use in California That Could Cause Bee Colonies to Collapse
- Rare Wildlife Habitat, Old Growth, Headwaters Protected from Church of the Woods Development Above Lake Arrowhead
- Mitigating Wildlife and Climate Impacts of Large Mixed-Use Development in Remote, Fire-Prone Area of San Diego County
- Ensuring Protection of Coho Salmon in Lagunitas Creek
- Averting Destructing of Habitat, Cultural Sites by Geotechnical Investigations for Pacheco Dam Project
- Protecting Lake Tahoe’s Water Quality from Discharges of Dangerous Herbicides
- Forcing a Large Industrial Park to Confront an Inadequate Water Supply
- Ensuring Protection of Water Quality in the Eel River from Large Infrastructure Projects
- Requiring a Water Supply for a Large Housing Development in Contra Costa County
- Establishing and Improving San Dieguito River Park